Senior Advocate Rajeev Dhavan attacked the test of comparative significance employed by the Supreme Court in its 1994 judgment in Ismail Faruqui v. Union of India for deciding the significance of a place of worship to a community. Arguing before the Bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices Ashok Bhushan and S Abdul Nazeer in the Ram Mandir–Babri dispute in the Supreme Court, Dhavan submitted, “Every temple, mosque, gurudwara, until the government decides to acquire it, is to be protected; There is no comparative significance”, he said. The Court is currently considering whether or not the law laid down by the Supreme […]
The post <b>Ram Mandir-Babri:</b> Every temple, mosque is to be protected, Rajeev Dhavan
appeared first on Bar & Bench.