Kanu Agrawal The hearing in the Sabarimala case is drawing to a close and if media reports are to be believed, the Court seems to be keen on taking an interventionist approach. This interventionist approach restricting the freedom of religion has always been a Constitutionally contentious issue. Article 25 of the Constitution provides for freedom of conscience and the right to profess, practice and propagate religion subject to public order, morality and health, and also to the other provisions of Part III (fundamental rights). Article 26 confers on every religious denomination the right to manage their own affairs in matters of […]
The post <b>Sabarimala case in Supreme Court:</b> Ayyappa on the Constitutional Anvil
appeared first on Bar & Bench.